Phineas and detailor: A Comparative Study         Throughout the story, Phineas and constituent, the twain principal(prenominal) characters, showed a number of seaming traits. Phineas was a surefooted, non warring, naive, carefree, and headless soul end-to-end the story, whereas cistron, Phineas roommate, was insecure, private-enterprise(a), mature, measure get bynt, and intelligent throughout the story.         Phineas had a confident temper in e realthing he did. As Phineas and comp angiotensin converting enzyment offset printing tooshie met, they noniced they were both the same height, only if Phineas, being confident, utter, Where did you present that woozy shirt?(100). Only a individual with inhering assurance could pay insulted someone they dependable met because the other psyche could subscribe easily struck back to cause a conflict, besides Phineas confident nature helped him get through the circumstance as he laughed his way through the parley. A nonher theoretical account which showed Phineas confidence occurred during a conversation he had with cistron. make up though Phineas did not know broker, he tangle perfectly diffused talk provided now about his sexual history. The author developed what Phineas was talking about as he verbalize, He had experienced it trine times, and gave detailed, entirely matter-of-fact and unboastful accounts of all in all three.(101). If Phineas was not a confident soul, he would not nurture sh occur over his story with a round out stranger. cistron, on the other hand, was a in truth insecure soulfulness. The reader was able to see factors insecurities when he first act to pay a conversation with Phineas. His roommate was being precise univocal in revealing the stories of his past, but when it came for agents turn to tell his stories he felt his ideas would have been as dull as catechism later onwardwards his;(101). If ingredient was confident, he would have bee! n comfortable in partaking in the conversation amidst him and his roommate. Another lawsuit dis head for the hillsing elements insecure nature occurred after Phineas ridiculed him for his choice of shirt. After a small dividing line amid the two, element gave in and admitted to himself that his shirt was dizzy by saying, It was compensate(103) when replying to a rude comment Phineas made on his shirt. If ingredient was more secure in his own choices, he could have stood up for himself, and not let anyone cut him up or insult his choice of shirt.         One definite contrariety betwixt Phineas and Gene was their competitive natures. Phineas was a naturally adroit athletic supporter who excelled in e truly sport he play and did not have the sine qua non to compete with others. An example of Phineas just finding the fun in sports and not being competitive occurred when he was discussing football with Gene. Phines explained, In a sport youve got to be loos e..you have to invent something new all the time(104). When Phineas express this, he explained how he enjoyed the fun out of games and not the assault about it. When Phineas was explaining football to Gene, he stated, Its just like those sibilate push-ups and knee-bends today,(104). Phineas did not like the fact he had to follow rules and maps, he just cherished to enjoy the activity. Gene, however, was very competitive, especially toward Phineas. Gene did not like the fact that Phineas was a natural supporter, so when he would beat Phineas in school, he became very happy. Gene stated, He might be the best natural athlete in the school, the most popular boy, but I was harming where it counted.(105). Even though he and Phineas were not in competition, Gene ceaselessly managed to punish and be on top. Gene was aware that Phineas did not excel academically, but in his mind he believed Phineas was assay to take me in; he hated the fact that I could beat him at this(105), al though Gene knew Phineas had no disposition to compe! te with him.         Phineas and Genes psycheality in addition differed in the area of maturity. Phineas was a very naive boy whose every move was very ingenuous and harmless. An example of Phineas being naive occurred when Gene was describing the acts that Phineas performed innocently where no one could cut him down, but if another person doted the same acts they would instantly be ridiculed. Gene explained how for all Phineas acts, felling them was unthinkable.(102). This turn up that Phineas was naive because for a person to commit such acts, they must have an innocent attitude, which Phineas obviously had. Gene also explained how Phineas was the essence of this careless peace. This quote explained how Phineas must have an inside peace within himself that is emerged to others, therefore his actions are passed as innocent games. Phineas may be innocent and naive, but Gene be to be somewhat mature for his age. One agent where Gene be to be mature occurred when he admitted to himself that he near started to like Phineas as he stated, I approximately indispensableness him, even(105). For one to admit they like the person who they are trying their difficultest to hate takes maturity as the person is forfeiting their opinions to try and make a clean slate and be a better person, which is exactly what Gene did in this case.         A contrast is also seen between Gene and Phineas in their responsibility. Phineas be to be a very unaccountable person. One example displaying Phineas irresponsible nature occurred when he and Gene were studying for a cut examination. Phineas cherished to cut across sour a steer into urine, than to contract on studying and achieving a satisfactory mark. When Gene told Phineas he should stay, Phineas replied, You indispensableness to study?(108). At the time, Phineas did not understand the wideness of studying for his test. Gene persistently tried to keep Phineas from leave t he books as he stated sarcastically, You know, books! , examinations?
(108), butPhineas lock up found it hard to believe that Gene wanted to study, indeed showing that Phineas was an irresponsible student. Gene on the other hand was a very responsible student because he wanted to stay in and study for his French test kinda than jump off a direct as his friends wanted him to. Gene stated to Phineas as he tried to explain his situation, If I need to study, then so do you.(108). This proven that Gene was responsible because at that time, he sacrificed having fun for his grades. more proof demonstrating Genes wiz of responsibility occurred when he stated to Phineas, We lookout man lily-liver Lepelier not jump from the tree, and I ruin my grade(108), because it showed how Gene was aware of the consequences of not studying. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â One last difference between the two characters in the story is the fact that one of the boys was a accomplice, whereas the other was a drawing card. Gene prove to be a follower when Phineas jumped of the tree into a body of water and he followed him. Even though Gene did not want to jump of the tree, he did so anyway because he wanted to be like Phineas. Gene explained his feelings toward the tree when he stated, I hated the very beingness of that tree(106). Genes statement proved he was a follower because if it were not for Phineas, Gene would not have had any lust to jump. Gene later explained, When Phineas did it backward one evening, so did I(107). Genes statement proved he was a follower because he had to jump off the tree backwards to feel he was equal to Phineas. Gene proved he was a follower, insofar Phineas prov ed to be a natural attraction. Phineas was the first! person to jump off the tree, and after he did, other kids coupled him. Gene stated, none of us believed that we would jump from it. None but Phineas(105). This proved that Phineas was a leader because it explained how Phineas jumped first off the tree, and no one else believed they could. Phineas proved he was a natural leader even at the begin of the story when he and Gene first met. Phineas was the fist one to speak out of the two of them, as Gene commented, That first day, standing in that comfortless room, amid his clothes, he began to talk and I began to listen(100). Gene explained how he listened to Phineas speak when they first met, which proved that Phineas was a leader because he began the conversation, and instead of participating, Gene just listened. The two characters in the goldbrick story, Phineas, proved to have very contrasting personality traits throughout the entire story. Phineas was confident, non competitive, naive, irresponsible, unintelligent, and a natu ral leader, whereas Gene was insecure, competitive, mature, responsible, intelligent, and a follower. consequently causing them to be foils. If you want to get a full moon essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
